Srinagar, Dec 30: In a significant decision considering the seriousness of cybercrimes, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Adil Mushtaq Ahmad, rejected the bail application of Gurpreet Singh, accused in digital arrest scam that deprived a senior citizen of ₹21 lakh.
The case, registered under FIR No. 26/2024 at the Cyber Police Station, Kashmir Zone Srinagar, revealed a deeply troubling scheme. The accused allegedly operated a “mule account” used to launder illicit funds obtained through fraudulent means. The victim, an elderly individual, was manipulated into prematurely closing fixed deposits worth ₹21 lakh and transferring the money under false pretences.
During the hearing, the court was presented with substantial evidence of the accused’s active involvement in the case.
J&K to Witness Moderate Snowfall in First Week of January
Rejecting the bail plea, the Judge observed:
“Cybercrimes like this are calculated and deliberate acts that exploit victims for personal gain, leaving them financially and emotionally devastated. The collective interest of society outweighs the individual liberty of the accused in such cases.”
The court also highlighted the broader implications of economic crimes, citing them as a serious threat to public trust, financial stability, and societal welfare. The Judge referred to landmark Supreme Court judgments to emphasize that economic offenses require a stringent approach due to their intricate and far-reaching impact.
Assistant Public Prosecutor, Mohammad Lateef, with clear and compelling arguments, outlined how the accused coordinated with accomplices to operate accounts designed to obscure the illicit origins of the funds. He also highlighted the immense suffering caused to the victim, including psychological distress and financial hardship.
This ruling sends a clear message in addressing the growing menace of cybercrimes with utmost seriousness.
The court emphasized the need to protect citizens from such frauds, which often target vulnerable individuals, by ensuring that offenders face the full extent of the law. This case serves as a reminder to the public about the increasing prevalence of digital frauds and the importance of vigilance in online financial transactions.
